Or leave us a private message

.net dll using third party libaries
Hi,
I'm trying to build a new dll and have some issues with it, when adding it to a step in warewolf workflow.
I've used this resource of creating the dll: https://warewolf.io/knowledge-base/using-dlls/
1. I've notice that different namespaces does not work well (after i fixed namespaces then methods works).
2. Then when u include my data layer on my new dll then the workflow raize an "Object Refrence Not Set",
NB* : I've tested my dll with UnitTests and the dll does work just in warewolf workflow is not working.
Did anyone else have this same issue, and what is the best practice of using the dll component in warewolf workflow.

Parameter 'warewolf-variable' not found in the collection.
When calling a MySql stored procedure, We are getting bug:
<FatalError><Message> An internal error occurred while executing the service request </Message><InnerError>Parameter 'rfiduid' not found in the collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure:
);
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table:
CREATE TABLE `rfid_uid` (

error workflow
Why when I click an the "New service" Button shows me an error ?
Why when I try to open the workflow "Hello world" whows me an error?
System.Windows.Markup.XamlParseException: Se produjo una excepción al establecer connectionId. ---> System.InvalidCastException: No se puede convertir un objeto de tipo 'System.Windows.Input.CommandBinding' al tipo 'System.Activities.Presentation.View.DesignerView'.




Highlight Decision tool outputs
Just a suggestion. The Decision tool at the moment will have 2 grey lines coming out of it, (1 for the true output and 1 for the false output). This is fine for simple workflows, however as the workflows get more and more complex, there are instances where outputs from decisions will overlap each other and head toward the same assign/workflow/process etc. Is is possible that when clicked on, the decision tool itself and the output lines are highlighted as well so that somebody using the program would have an easier time following the process flow with having to open up the tools to have a look at the outputs?
Regards

Can I create an interface like werewolf with prebuilt icons with properties and connections for my client to structure his assets online ? For example, I would like to offer a page to my user where he can create a network diagram or a orgn chart.

It sounds like you are trying to abstract the studio into a web page?
This is not possible with Warewolf. The studio is a desktop application that has no public interfaces at this stage.
Please let us know if this is not what you are asking.

dbl clickig an itme should bring up the properties dialog

unintuative. Couldnt make workflow variables inputs
think of it this way. When you define an interface method you dont make them parameterless you generally know what you want to achieve. Perhaps a hint popup to let us know

Thanks for the idea.

Unload external dlls from the designer
However in discovering this I rebuilt my dll a number of times. I couldnt copy it to the place I had referenced because warewolf has a handle to that DLL. Im assuming you host components like this in a separate appDomain so if you give me the ability to recycle that so I can do a build / deploy cycle without me having to shutdown warewolf would be great. If you can already do this and I just havnt figured out how, ... well then shame on me :)

decision trees getting cluttered
Income > 10000 goes to the 1st outcome, >8000 the 2nd and > 5000 the third.
In the current version you have to make a tree looking like the left pic in the diagram.
If you attached priorities to a decision you could make it look like the second diagram. Say your income is 9000, you will fail the first check but pass both 2 and 3, however if you have a priority you would pass the income > 8000 check and stop evaluation at that point. Maybe a useful idea? Things like risk pricing models would benefit greatly from this and the designer space would look far less cluttered

My guess is you are talking about bundling up individual decisions into a single decision tree activity that would act like a switch.
Is this correct?
Служба підтримки клієнтів працює на UserEcho