cryptocurrency exchange script

Thanks....

Docker container is not able to connect to remote server for Unit Test, currently we are pulling warewolf version 2.8.6.16

Hi team,

We have noticed that when we debug a Main workflow, that contains several child workflow, we are able to see the full debug for the process. However, when we click the "Create a new test" button on the Debug Output, as per snip below, the test that gets generated only populates the inputs and outputs of the Main workflow - meaning the variables, objects and or recordsets associated with the child workflows doesn't populate or pull through - 

The current reality of how it is working currently is that we then have to manually populate all the other variables / objects and / or recordsets for the inputs / outputs of the child workflows in order to get the test to pass, else it will fail. Some of the variables like GUIDS are also unique with each execution, and because we are unable to copy and paste from the debug output we need to manually type these out. We work with some complex and large Main workflows with a lot child workflows, which means by manually filling in these variables, objects or recordsets can easily take 35 - 45 mins to complete for one test. 

Is there a better, faster, more accurate way of generating unit tests in the future?

A discussed low hanging fruit was to allow the ability to copy inputs / outputs from the debug output.

Please share your thinking of what is possible - we can put our heads together and come up with a good - viable long term solution that can enhance the dev process (Time and accuracy).

Regards,

Wynand

Hello team,

I recently discovered that when I use the Get Tool in Warewolf 2.8.6.16 whereby when you Generate Outputs on the tool, it doesn't give you the option to map the single response as a variable as shown below workflow from a previous version of Warewolf (2.8.3) -

Warewolf 2.8.6.16 returns the following:

Can this please be investigated? Also, from experience I know the code for the Get Tool and Post tool are very similar, can you pls confirm that the Post Tool can also output as a variable.

Regards,

Wynand

Hello team,

Is it currently possible to connect to Polybase using the existing Warewolf functionality or, would a tool need to be created?

Regards,

Wynand

Morning everyone,

Context: Business is looking at saving messaging cost, by sending an email instead of an sms - as it works out cheaper. In the business we do however face a concern with regards to the correctness of the email addresses captured by agents. We are now looking at reporting on incorrectly captured contact details in an attempt to increase the success rates of contacting our customers.  

Approach: We looked at using the decision tool's Is Regex functionality, with regular expression /^\w+([\.-]?\w+)*@\w+([\.-]?\w+)*(\.\w{2,3})+$/ to validate an email.

Problem: We found that the functionality is not working as expected - when entering a valid email address the validation fails instead of passing.

I have attached a sample workflow to demonstrate the concern: EmailValidation.bite 

When the advanced recordset tries to process a recordset that does not exist it does not throw an error but instead makes the rest of the workflow unresponsive.

Hello , 

Warewolf Server Configuration 

Warewolf version - 2.8.1.3

Workflow - 1200 

CPU(s) - 16 cores 

RAM - 64 GB 

we are deploying Warewolf server using azure pipeline. the command we are using to refresh workflow is 

powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Command "Invoke-WebRequest http://localhost:3142/services/FetchExplorerItemsService.json?ReloadResourceCatalogue=true -UseBasicParsing -UseDefaultCredentials"

as you can see in above screenshot , it is hang up there by 1 hours , in most case it should be finish by 10 secs. 

could you please support us to fix this problem ? 

Hi

I am currently running warewolf on a VM with 8 vCPUs, I want to know how do I get insight into how many workflows are currently running and utilizing threads and how many are being queued to run

The reason I would like this insight is to be able to accurately monitor performance to ensure that I have enough vCPUs for the amount of workflows processing and also to know when to upscale or down scale correctly to be able to save costs.

My monitoring product that I am currently using is PRTG for monitoring my VM's

Hello Team,

The Get Web Method Tool does not provide / map an output when using "Generate Outputs" on Warewolf 2.8.4.0, however execution level works fine for tools that were mapped with certain previous versions of Warewolf.

Example of Mapped output on Warewolf 2.8.3.19:

Example on Warewolf 2.8.4.0:

Herewith a recording with Yogesh regarding the topic - Catch-up; Masi, Wynand and Igor-20230720_100030-Meeting Recording.mp4